VidhiSangh

Supreme Court of India · 08/05/2019

BIRENDRA PRASAD SAH versus THE STATE OF BIHAR & ANR.

[2019] 8 S.C.R. 702 · 2019 INSC 649

AI-generated headnote. Verify against the judgment before relying on it. Paragraph numbers refer to the judgment.

Summary

A cheque-dishonour complaint was restored because sufficient cause existed to condone its delayed filing when reckoned from the first, timely statutory notice. The complainant’s unsuccessful attempts to obtain postal acknowledgment and the circumstances leading to a second notice were adequately explained. Even presumed service of the first notice did not defeat condonation. The Court did not rely on the later notice as a fresh cause of action or decide the substantive allegations.

Issues

  1. Whether the delayed complaint could proceed on the first timely notice despite subsequent notice and disputed service.
  2. Whether sufficient cause justified condonation under Section 142.

Provisions considered

Held

Result

Appeal allowed. High Court’s quashing order set aside and complaint restored to the trial court. Delay condonation sustained on the explained circumstances, reckoned on the basis of the first notice. Merits left open for trial.

Judgment PDF: Supreme Court of India, [2019] 8 S.C.R. 702.