VidhiSangh

Supreme Court of India · 17/09/2021

SATYA PRAKASH DWIVEDI versus MUNNA ALIAS CHANDRABHAN YADAV AND OTHERS

[2021] 9 S.C.R. 259 · 2021 INSC 491

AI-generated headnote. Verify against the judgment before relying on it. Paragraph numbers refer to the judgment.

Summary

The Court restored the Tribunal’s Rs.5,42,633 accident-compensation award after the High Court reduced it in the injured claimant’s enhancement appeal. Order XLI Rule 33 conferred a broad but circumscribed power, to be used cautiously and exceptionally where necessary to adjust parties’ rights. With no insurer appeal or cross-objection and no justifiable reasons, it did not support reducing the unchallenged disability assessment here. The insurer was directed to pay the restored sum with seven per cent annual interest from the claim petition to payment within three months.

Issues

  1. Whether Order XLI Rule 33 justified reducing compensation in the claimant’s enhancement appeal without an insurer appeal or cross-objection.

Provisions considered

Held

Result

Appeal allowed without costs; Rs.5,42,633 restored with seven per cent annual interest from the claim petition to payment, payable by the insurer within three months.

Judgment PDF: Supreme Court of India, [2021] 9 S.C.R. 259.