VidhiSangh

Supreme Court of India · 07/05/2019

SASIKALA PUSHPA AND OTHERS versus STATE OF TAMIL NADU

[2019] 7 S.C.R. 319 · 2019 INSC 636

AI-generated headnote. Verify against the judgment before relying on it. Paragraph numbers refer to the judgment.

Summary

A mistaken date and place of execution in an admittedly signed vakalatnama did not, on the circumstances, establish forgery or intentional fraud warranting court-directed prosecution. The prosecution direction, resulting FIR and charge-sheet were quashed, subject to a bar on further consequential proceedings based on that quashing. Separate harassment and property-damage cases were not quashed: protection was extended in the former and anticipatory bail granted in the latter, with its merits left open.

Issues

  1. Whether the vakalatnama error justified a forgery prosecution and court-directed complaint.
  2. What relief was appropriate in the two separate criminal cases.

Held

Result

Forgery-prosecution direction set aside; FIR 1331/2016 and its charge-sheet quashed, with no further consequential proceedings based on that relief. Protection in Crime 5/2016 extended through disposal. Anticipatory bail granted in Crime 276/2016 through disposal, with liberty to seek quashing before the High Court. Appeals disposed of.

Judgment PDF: Supreme Court of India, [2019] 7 S.C.R. 319.