VidhiSangh

Supreme Court of India · 06/07/2023

THE MADRAS ALUMINIUM CO. LTD. versus THE TAMIL NADU ELECTRICITY BOARD AND ANR.

[2023] 10 S.C.R. 742 · 2023 INSC 607

AI-generated headnote. Verify against the judgment before relying on it. Paragraph numbers refer to the judgment.

Summary

The Electricity Board’s unexplained delay of over two and a half years in reducing contracted demand from 23,000 to 10,000 KVA was arbitrary. Its contractual entitlement to maximum-demand charges did not excuse prolonged inaction. The Court ordered refund of the excess demand charges for 23 June 2002 to 1 July 2004, with six per cent simple interest, within two months.

Issues

  1. Whether unexplained delay in deciding a request to reduce contracted electricity demand was arbitrary despite contractual maximum-demand obligations.
  2. Whether excess charges paid under protest during that delay were refundable.

Provisions considered

Held

Result

Appeals allowed; High Court judgment set aside. Verified excess demand charges for 23 June 2002–1 July 2004 inclusive to be refunded with 6% simple annual interest within two months; pending applications disposed of.

Judgment PDF: Supreme Court of India, [2023] 10 S.C.R. 742.