VidhiSangh

Supreme Court of India · 10/02/2020

ARUN SINGH & OTHERS versus STATE OF U.P. THROUGH ITS SECRETARY & ANOTHER

[2020] 3 S.C.R. 707 · 2020 INSC 163

AI-generated headnote. Verify against the judgment before relying on it. Paragraph numbers refer to the judgment.

Summary

The Supreme Court quashed the Section 493 IPC charge but permitted prosecution under the Dowry Prohibition Act to continue. Section 493 requires deceit inducing belief in an existing lawful marriage and consequent cohabitation; allegations about a settled future marriage with ceremonies still outstanding did not disclose that ingredient. Specific allegations of a Rs 5 lakh dowry demand did disclose an offence, and the asserted compromise did not justify quashing those societal offences.

Issues

  1. Whether the asserted compromise warranted quashing the noncompoundable charges.
  2. Whether the FIR disclosed the distinct ingredients of Section 493 IPC and the dowry offences.

Provisions considered

Held

Result

Charge sheet quashed insofar as Section 493 IPC was concerned. Appeal dismissed in respect of the charge sheet under Section 3 read with Section 4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act; those proceedings to continue.

Judgment PDF: Supreme Court of India, [2020] 3 S.C.R. 707.