VidhiSangh

Supreme Court of India · 02/09/2019

M.C. MEHTA versus UNION OF INDIA & ORS.

[2019] 11 S.C.R. 1053 · 2019 INSC 982

AI-generated headnote. Verify against the judgment before relying on it. Paragraph numbers refer to the judgment.

Summary

In continuing environmental proceedings, the Court issued directions addressing Delhi’s parking congestion, pedestrian access and planning failures. It required clearance of pavement encroachments after notice, prompt notification and enforcement of parking rules, and assessment of long-term parking needs before construction permissions. Pilot projects and reports on technological and last-mile solutions were directed; further measures were reserved pending those reports.

Issues

  1. What directions were required to protect pedestrian access and improve parking management and planning in Delhi.
  2. How pilot parking schemes and technological alternatives should be assessed.

Held

Result

Directions were issued in the continuing writ proceedings. Compliance on parking-rule notification and the specified viability report was listed for 4 October 2019; the matter was otherwise listed for 13 January 2020. Further directions were reserved after pilot-project reports.

Judgment PDF: Supreme Court of India, [2019] 11 S.C.R. 1053.