VidhiSangh

Supreme Court of India · 10/05/2019

DLF HOMES PANCHKULA PVT. LTD versus D.S. DHANDA, ETC. ETC.

[2019] 7 S.C.R. 1061 · 2019 INSC 682

AI-generated headnote. Verify against the judgment before relying on it. Paragraph numbers refer to the judgment.

Summary

For delayed flats in the DLF Valley project, overlapping and unsupported compensation heads were replaced with the Court’s specified interest and consolidated-cost directions. Possession claims attracted 9% interest after the three-year contractual period until two months after the possession offer, with maintenance safeguards and ₹50,000 consolidated compensation/costs. Refund claims were reduced to 9% interest with ₹35,000 costs, subject to the distinct transferee directions in the operative order.

Issues

  1. Whether multiple compensation heads for the same possession delay were sustainable.
  2. What interest, possession and refund directions should govern these project-specific claims.

Held

Result

Orders modified. Possession cases: 9% interest after three years from agreement through two months after offer, occupancy certificate, maintenance within two months and ₹50,000 consolidated relief per complaint; transferee start is later of three-year expiry and transfer. Refund cases: 9% from deposits to refund, with transferred-flat start as paragraph 24 directs; ₹35,000 costs maintained. Refund and costs payable within two months.

Judgment PDF: Supreme Court of India, [2019] 7 S.C.R. 1061.