VidhiSangh

Supreme Court of India · 05/04/2018

STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS versus DR. SHARVIL THATTE AND OTHERS

[2018] 3 S.C.R. 1008 · 2018 INSC 309

AI-generated headnote. Verify against the judgment before relying on it. Paragraph numbers refer to the judgment.

Summary

The Supreme Court dismissed Maharashtra’s appeal and upheld the striking down of the domicile condition in its 30 January 2018 notification for postgraduate medical and dental admissions in unaided private institutions. Relying on Pradeep Jain, Vishal Goyal and its judgment of the previous day concerning a similar Karnataka condition, the Court affirmed the High Court’s distinction between permissible institutional preference and the impugned domicile requirement.

Issues

  1. Whether the Maharashtra domicile eligibility condition for the specified postgraduate admissions could stand.

Held

Result

State appeal dismissed without costs; High Court’s invalidation of condition (ii) in the notification dated 30 January 2018 upheld.

Judgment PDF: Supreme Court of India, [2018] 3 S.C.R. 1008.