Summary
On a miscellaneous application, the Court modified its judgment of 29 November 2017 to correct the attribution of the parties’ arguments and replace the operative paragraph specifying which connected appeals were dismissed and which was allowed.
Issues
- What corrections were required to the attribution of submissions and disposition of connected appeals in the earlier judgment.
Held
- Paragraphs 13 and 14 were amended to distinguish the appellants and respondents in the main appeals from the parties occupying the opposite positions in the appeal arising from SLP(C) 27309 of 2012. (¶ 1(i)–(ii))
- The substituted paragraph 37 dismissed the main connected appeals and the appeal arising from SLP(C) 1851 of 2009, while allowing the appeal arising from SLP(C) 27309 of 2012. (¶ 1(iii))
Result
Application allowed; the earlier judgment stood modified in the specified terms.