VidhiSangh

Supreme Court of India · 26/11/2019

V. RAJARAM versus STATE REPRESENTED BY THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE CBI/SCB

[2019] 14 S.C.R. 977 · 2019 INSC 1282

AI-generated headnote. Verify against the judgment before relying on it. Paragraph numbers refer to the judgment.

Summary

A Deputy Superintendent of Police challenged the reversal of his acquittal for intentionally disobeying law to protect offenders and intentionally failing to apprehend them during the Dinakaran office attack. The Supreme Court found that he acted under the officer commanding security, helped disperse agitators and later arrested accused persons. The prosecution had not established the required intentional misconduct. The trial court’s acquittal was a plausible view which the High Court should not have displaced.

Issues

  1. Whether the evidence established intentional disobedience or intentional omission to apprehend offenders.
  2. Whether reversal of the trial court’s acquittal was justified.

Provisions considered

Held

Result

Appeals allowed. The High Court’s conviction and sentences under sections 217 and 221 were set aside and the appellant acquitted. He was left free to pursue pension and retirement benefits according to law, with authorities to take note of the acquittal. Other accused’s appeals remained to be decided independently.

Judgment PDF: Supreme Court of India, [2019] 14 S.C.R. 977.