VidhiSangh

Supreme Court of India · 23/09/2021

NATIONAL HIGHWAYS AUTHORITY OF INDIA & OTHERS versus MADHUKAR KUMAR & OTHERS

[2021] 13 S.C.R. 299 · 2021 INSC 532

AI-generated headnote. Verify against the judgment before relying on it. Paragraph numbers refer to the judgment.

Summary

The Court upheld the toll plaza at km 194 of NH30 and set aside the direction to shift it. Rule 8(1)’s second proviso independently permitted the location where the highway construction within municipal limits primarily served local residents. It did not import the first proviso’s express requirement of recorded reasons, though a competent decision, application of mind and supporting material remained necessary. The evidence and petitioners’ own pleading established compliance. Directions required proper decision records, removal of unauthorised barriers and full statutory concessions.

Issues

  1. Whether the second proviso to Rule 8(1) imported the first proviso’s requirement of reasons recorded in writing.
  2. Whether the toll-plaza location satisfied the statutory conditions and Article 14.
  3. Whether the unappealed companion writ judgment prevented relief, and what consequential safeguards were required.

Provisions considered

Held

Result

Appeal allowed without costs; toll-plaza relocation direction set aside. Unauthorised barriers to be removed within two weeks, record-maintenance directions issued within three weeks, and statutory concessions fully extended.

Judgment PDF: Supreme Court of India, [2021] 13 S.C.R. 299.