VidhiSangh

Supreme Court of India · 01/03/2024

VINAYAK PURSHOTTAM DUBE (DECEASED), THROUGH LRS. versus JAYASHREE PADAMKAR BHAT & OTHERS

[2024] 3 S.C.R. 127 · 2024 INSC 159

AI-generated headnote. Verify against the judgment before relying on it. Paragraph numbers refer to the judgment.

Summary

Legal representatives of a deceased sole proprietor are not personally liable to perform contractual obligations that were personal to the proprietor, including obligations dependent on the proprietor’s own skill or capacity. They represent the deceased’s estate and may be required to satisfy surviving monetary or property-related liabilities only to the extent of the estate received by them.

Issues

  1. Whether legal representatives of a deceased sole proprietor can be directed to perform the proprietor’s personal contractual obligations under a development agreement.
  2. To what extent a decree may be enforced against legal representatives and the deceased’s estate.

Provisions considered

Held

Result

Appeals allowed; the portions of the consumer-forum orders imposing the deceased proprietor’s personal contractual obligations on his legal representatives were set aside. Payment directions may be satisfied from the deceased’s estate if not already satisfied. Parties were to bear their own costs.

Judgment PDF: Supreme Court of India, [2024] 3 S.C.R. 127.