VidhiSangh

Supreme Court of India · 23/02/2018

THE STATE OF TAMIL NADU REP. BY SEC. AND ORS. versus K. BALU AND ANR.

[2018] 1 S.C.R. 661 · 2018 INSC 188

AI-generated headnote. Verify against the judgment before relying on it. Paragraph numbers refer to the judgment.

Summary

In this February 2018 modification of the highway-liquor directions, the Supreme Court extended the exemption from the specified 500-metre distance requirement to Mizoram because of its peculiar topography. For Assam, the exemption was confined to Karbi Anglong, West Karbi Anglong and Dima Hasao (North Cachar Hills), identified on affidavit as hill districts. The order extended the earlier Meghalaya and Sikkim exemption rather than exempting Assam as a whole.

Issues

  1. Whether the topography of Mizoram justified extending the earlier distance-rule exemption.
  2. Which identified hill districts of Assam qualified for that exemption.

Held

Result

Miscellaneous/interlocutory applications disposed of. Specified distance-requirement exemption extended to Mizoram and the three identified hill districts of Assam.

Judgment PDF: Supreme Court of India, [2018] 1 S.C.R. 661.