VidhiSangh

Supreme Court of India · 26/08/2022

JAGJIT SINGH AND OTHERS ETC. ETC. versus STATE OF PUNJAB AND ANOTHER ETC. ETC

[2022] 11 S.C.R. 73 · 2022 INSC 876

AI-generated headnote. Verify against the judgment before relying on it. Paragraph numbers refer to the judgment.

Summary

Punjab landowners appealed against High Court judgments fixing compensation for acquired land at Rs. 7,80,000 per acre, following Kapoor Singh, and in one case Rs. 19,85,700 per acre, following Surjit Singh. In 2014 the Supreme Court had raised the compensation in those lead cases by a further Rs. 1 lakh and Rs. 2 lakh per acre respectively, payable by the Greater Mohali Area Development Authority. The Court held that the appellants were similarly placed and partly allowed the appeals on the same terms, with statutory solatium on the enhancement from the dates of the High Court orders. Because of substantial delay, interest was denied for the period from the High Court judgments until the appeals were filed in the Supreme Court. The Authority was directed to deposit the amount within three months.

Issues

  1. Whether landowners similarly situated to those in Kapoor Singh and Surjit Singh are entitled to the same enhancement of compensation granted by the Supreme Court in those cases
  2. Whether interest on the enhanced amount should be denied for the period of delay

Held

Result

Appeals partly allowed; compensation enhanced by Rs. 1,00,000 per acre (Rs. 2,00,000 per acre in the appeal from RFA No. 4975 of 2010) with solatium, interest denied for the delay period, and the Greater Mohali Area Development Authority to deposit the amount within three months; no costs.

Judgment PDF: Supreme Court of India, [2022] 11 S.C.R. 73.