VidhiSangh

Supreme Court of India · 15/07/2025

NEETHU B. @ NEETHU BABY MATHEW versus RAJESH KUMAR

[2025] 7 S.C.R. 1053 · 2025 INSC 853

AI-generated headnote. Verify against the judgment before relying on it. Paragraph numbers refer to the judgment.

Summary

Review of a Supreme Court order confirming transfer of a child's permanent custody from the mother to the father was allowed under Article 137: the child's post-judgment deterioration in mental health, documented in clinical reports, was new evidence that could not have been produced earlier and bore directly on his welfare. Custody orders are interlocutory and may be moulded in the child's best interest; permanent custody was restored to the mother with structured visitation for the father.

Issues

  1. Whether the deterioration of a child's mental health after a judgment changing his custody constitutes new evidence justifying review under Article 137 of the Constitution.
  2. Whether, on the facts, transferring permanent custody from the mother, the child's sole caregiver since infancy, to the biological father served the child's best interests.
  3. What visitation arrangement should be made for the biological father.

Provisions considered

Held

Result

Review petitions allowed; order dated 22.08.2024 recalled, civil appeals restored and allowed; High Court order dated 17.10.2023 set aside; permanent custody with the mother; father to have two 30-minute virtual interactions a week and seven hours' in-person visitation every Saturday or Sunday through the Family Court, Ottapalam; mother restrained from relocating the child outside India, foreign travel only in Onam, Christmas and half the summer vacation on prior notice; re-assessment at CMC Vellore before 31.10.2025; no overnight stay for now, with liberty to seek modification.

Judgment PDF: Supreme Court of India, [2025] 7 S.C.R. 1053.