VidhiSangh

Supreme Court of India · 25/08/2025

RAVINDRA PRATAP SHAHI versus STATE OF U.P. & ORS.

[2025] 8 S.C.R. 1525 · 2025 INSC 1039

AI-generated headnote. Verify against the judgment before relying on it. Paragraph numbers refer to the judgment.

Summary

A criminal appeal pending in the Allahabad High Court since 2008 was heard and reserved for judgment on 24.12.2021, but no judgment was delivered and the matter was relisted before a regular Bench. Treating the delay as a recurring systemic failure, the Supreme Court reiterated the Anil Rai guidelines and issued an additional direction to the Registrars General of all High Courts to monitor reserved judgments and place undelivered judgments before the Chief Justice for reassignment.

Issues

  1. What directions should issue where a High Court hears a matter, reserves it for judgment and then fails to pronounce the judgment for a prolonged period?

Held

Result

Appeals disposed of with the above observations and directions; a copy of the judgment to be circulated to the Registrars General of all High Courts for compliance.

Judgment PDF: Supreme Court of India, [2025] 8 S.C.R. 1525.